๐Ÿ’ฃ Regulatory Impacts: ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil and ๐ŸŒ Europe Face Pressure on Virtual Asset Self-Custody

Morgan Ellis

๐Ÿ’ฃ Regulatory Impacts: ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil and ๐ŸŒ Europe Face Pressure on Virtual Asset Self-Custody

๐Ÿ’ฅ Europe Moves Forward with MiCA, But at What Cost?

The implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) on December 30, 2024, has sparked a wave of concerns. The emphasis on controlling transactions involving non-custodial wallets and the mandatory traceability requirements have significantly increased operational costs for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

โœ… Tough Regulations, Reduced Competitiveness

๐Ÿ”ฃ Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 mandates detailed identification of all parties involved in transactions, in line with FATFguidelines for monitoring illicit activities.

๐Ÿ”ฃ European CASPs are facing surging compliance costs and raising concerns about their economic sustainability under these stringent rules.

๐Ÿ”ฃ The phrase "US innovates, EU regulates" echoes louder than ever, particularly as the United States debates deregulation policies.

๐Ÿ” An Uncertain Future for the Virtual Assets Sector

With regulators tightening their grip, striking a balance between innovation and compliance is becoming an increasingly daunting challenge for ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil and ๐ŸŒ Europe.

๐Ÿ“ข #CryptoRegulation #InnovationOrSetback #SelfCustody

๐Ÿฆ Payouter.com โ€” looking for traders for processing in ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ India: P2P, P2C, Intent. We are waiting for you

CryptoRegulationInnovationOrSetbackSelfCustody

Comments